I’ve had a
lucky break with this paper’s ‘Team Roulette’. The random chances of ending up
with a team of four like-minded mature students who don’t like to leave things
to the last minute must have been pretty slim, but here we all are, nearly at
the end of assignment two. I haven’t done a group study project before so this
has been a first, and although we’re spread all around the country and have
never met, I think we’re working in together very well.
I can not
imagine how hard this would have been if I was a new student without the
advantage of experience, from work and from the understanding I’ve gained over
the years through having a hundred flatmates.
Thank you, team-finding student forum! (Lest you think it was some kind
of sorting-hat procedure, there was an aspect of like gravitating to like. But
with hindsight I can see how easy it would have been to become part of a team
much younger than myself, who had not yet lived in a hundred flats or had to
meet a deadline.) Whew.
![]() |
Not. Slytherin. Photo credit: Warner Bros |
Skyping and
emailing though is a poor substitute for face-to-face discussion. OneNote and
Dropbox have made some aspects of collaboration easier, certainly OneNote
helped a lot with the planning. Skype has its advantages; the chat function has
been a revelation, great for nights when not everyone is available as it leaves
a papertrail of the discussion. OneNote has advantages and disadvantages - I
can’t even remember now why we didn’t use it for the final report document,
though I recall my frustration. Something
went wrong. (Obviously I'm that mature I’ve managed to move on successfully.) Dropbox is great
for collaborating on documents, IF changes are tracked, and if everyone uses
the in-document commenting function. But if tracking is off, version control
becomes impossibly frustrating.
In terms of
my role as editor, it’s been strange working with material I haven’t done the
research for. In some ways it’s harder to revise and edit unfamiliar topics,
but on the other hand it puts me in a good position for seeing, objectively,
whether the text makes sense. I can see now, more than ever before, that an
efficient editor is a decisive and bossy editor… I suspect my style is a little
too collaborative to be truly efficient in this role.
Overall I’ve
been impressed by how sensible our team has been about decision-
making. Compromises
made, expertise respected, and egos put aside. I think if we were ship-wrecked
on a desert island we’d probably do pretty well, as a group. By the time that rescue ship came by we’d have had ourselves organised well ahead of time and formatted seven different
versions of ‘HELP’ in burning driftwood on the beach. (Calibri.)
![]() |
Credit: James Climer |
Team roulette; my idea, was to look for similar like minded sounding people. I know it was a complete stab in the dark. Luckily I spotted Emmas introduction before getting desperate and was happy when she seemed keen. It all has worked out rather well.
ReplyDeleteWe're not called Team 1 for nothin'! I'm so happy we found each other in such conditions - it was a total free-for-all on the forum! The challenges of distance learning and group work hasn't really kept us down and it's been a pretty major learning opportunity for me.
ReplyDeletegreat team - no denying that. Liz, Catherine and Meg you were all amazing. Given our spread out locations all over New Zealand I am really impressed we managed to do the assignments so well. Imagine if we'd been in the same city for brainstorming (over a social and sensible amount of wine) and final edits...
ReplyDelete